RSS

27 ก.ย.

 *งานชินนี้เป็นรายงานการวิจัยของอาจารย์วิทยากร เชียงกูล  เกี่ยวกับปัญหาความยากจนของคนไทย*

[ABSTRACT]

SUSTAINABLE   APROACH  FOR  SOLVING  PROBLEMS  OF THE POOR

Mr.Witayakorn  Chiengkul 

      The main stream economists defining  The poor as those who has income below income poverty line [based on human basic minimum needs] is  too narrow and led to early-presumed conclusion that since Thailand  has implemented the pro-growth market oriented development plan in 1961 up  to 1996, percentage of the poor has reduced progressively.  So the solutions of the poverty problem in their view should be to promote more pro-growth  market oriented investment which is misleading

      In reality, this kind of pro-growth development policy in the already unjust Thai socio-economic structure led to increasing income gap among the 20%  richest and the 80% poorest group and increse number and percentage of the majority poor who do not only has relatively less wealth and purchasing power but has absolutely less natural and social capital or access to self sufficient  food  production as well.

      To find more  sustainable solution, we need to have broader perception of poverty causes and  solutions than the mainstream pro-growth  market oriented view.

      Alternative  view claim that poverty  is  caused  by Thai political, economic and social structure and pro-growth market oriented policy that worsen the environment, disitibution of wealth, income, and other social  opportunitites among the peoples.

      The poor should be measured by many combined faxtors rather than the earnd cash. For  those farmers who still have high  proportion of self-sufficient  farming [have their  own  rice as principal food]  they  are in need of cash less than more marketed oriented farmers.  Measurement of the non-poor [VS. poor] are such as proper house, occupation or the mode of earning a living, mode of   living, ability to join community activities and stability in family institution.

      The main causes that make some one poorer are the lack of land and capital due to the unequal  distribution of new clearance land by the central and local  authority and many  cases by new public  projects such  as large  reservoirs and dams that make peasants lost their land without fair compensation.

      Poverty at village level involve geo-economic position of the will age, water  supply, access to natural  resources, market and other communications, the level of economic and social capital  accumulation, access to earning in non-agricultural sector.

      Therefore, we have to view “poverty” as the structural poverty in term of deprivation of economic, political and social  rights and opportunities.

      To  find the solutions for eradication of poverty, one need a radical structural economic and social reforms for fairer distribution of wealth, income, education and other social  access as well as balanced and sustainable social development policy. 

Advertisements
 

One response to “

  1. เอเจล

    พฤษภาคม 3, 2011 at 12:10 am

    แปลเป็นภาษาไทยด้วยก็ดีนะครับ ^_^

     

ใส่ความเห็น

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / เปลี่ยนแปลง )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / เปลี่ยนแปลง )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / เปลี่ยนแปลง )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / เปลี่ยนแปลง )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: